News

Kill or Cure

More than 200 doctors express concern in an open letter about the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak 

In an open letter dated 10th September to the Belgian Government more than 200 Doctors have written to express very strong feelings about the handling of this “Deadly Pandemic”

Living in the Netherlands and with my wife and daughter both working in Healthcare I would have to been blind not to come across it. Having read it we translated it into English and after reading it in great detail we feel it would be negligent of us not to publish it in full

Put simply, this is the plain unvarnished truth about Covid 19 and its high time the rest of the planet got to hear about it.

The original link is here

https://www.despecialist.eu/nl/opinies/al187-artsen-uiten-bezorgdheid-aanpak-uitbraak-sars-cov-2-in-open-brief.html

 

Letter begins:- 

 The open letter from doctors and health professionals to all governments in Belgium and the Belgian media about the policy in the pandemic crisis has already collected a lot of signatures. The signatories express their “grave concern” about the current state of affairs.

“We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, would like to use this route to express our serious concerns about the state of affairs in recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

“We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and the mandatory implementation of the corona measures.

We call for the policy debate on corona to revisit the purpose that the measures should serve: improving our public health, physically, mentally and emotionally.

We argue that the measures to get the corona virus under control are disproportionate and cause more damage than good.

There is no longer any medical ground to justify this policy: we therefore argue for an immediate end to all measures.

We demand a restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and an open debate, where all experts are discussed without any form of censorship.

Solution no worse than the disease

“‘A solution must not be worse than the disease’ is a proposition that is more topical than ever in the current situation. However, we note in the field that the collateral damage that is now being caused to the population, in the short and long term. will have more impact in all walks of life in the long term than the number of corona victims that are currently being protected. ”

“The current corona measures and the severe punishments for non-compliance are, in our opinion, contrary to the values ​​formulated by the Belgian Superior Health Council, which until recently as a health authority has always monitored quality medicine in our country:” Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality – Independence – Transparency. ”

“We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures, which are not sufficiently scientifically founded, are unilaterally steered, and that there is insufficient room in the media for an open debate in which different views and opinions are heard. Moreover, now every municipality also receives and provincial authority to add its own measures, substantiated or not.

“The strict repressive policy surrounding corona is also in stark contrast to the hitherto minimal policy that the government pursues when it comes to disease prevention, strengthening the own immune system through a healthy lifestyle, optimal care with attention for the individual and investment in healthcare personnel. ”

The concept of health

“In 1948, WHO defined health as follows:” Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or other physical ailments. ”

“Health is therefore a broad concept, which goes beyond the physical, and also relates to the emotional and social well-being of the individual. Belgium also has a duty, in subscribing to fundamental human rights, to uphold these rights of to include people in their decision-making when it comes to measures taken in the context of public health. ”

“The current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate this vision of health and human rights to a large extent. The measures include the mandatory wearing of a mouth mask (also in the open air and during sports activities, and in some municipalities even when there are no other people around), physical distancing, social isolation, mandatory quarantine for some groups and hygiene measures. ”

The predicted pandemic with millions of deaths

“At the start of the pandemic, the measures were understandable and widely supported, even though there was a difference in implementation with the countries around us. The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4% victims, ie millions of deaths, and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was available, which would put unprecedented pressure on the ICUs (intensive care units) of our hospitals.

This has led to a worldwide alarm, unseen in human history: “flatten the curve” was proposed by means of a lockdown that shut down the entire society and economy and quarantined healthy people. Social distancing became the new normal in anticipation of a rescue vaccine. ”

The facts about Covid 19

“Along the way, many sources have sounded the alarm: the objective facts showed something completely different.” “The course of Covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season, first the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the corona viruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see. ”

“The use of the nonspecific PCR test, which yields many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test was rushed through with an urgent procedure and was never seriously tested itself. The maker explicitly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics ”

“The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is constantly being enlarged. Any contamination (eg other viruses, debris of old virus genome) can potentially test false positive.”

“The test therefore does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real virus infection means a massive presence of viruses, the so-called virus load. If the test is positive in someone, it does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected. is ill or will become ill. The postulate of Koch was not fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints, can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person”). ”

“Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures taken, which are based solely on these tests.”

If we compare the contamination waves of countries with strict lockdown policies with countries that did not (Sweden, Iceland…), we see similar curves. So there is no relationship between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection did not result in lower mortality. ”

“If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns, we see that it was set after the peak had already passed and was falling. The decrease was therefore not the effect of the measures taken.”

“As every year, it rather seems that it is climatic conditions (weather, temperature and humidity) and growing immunity, which are responsible for reducing the wave of infection.”

Our immune system

“For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi).

The entry of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defense mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system is based on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Over-hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity.  Only people with a weak or defective immune system should be protected by applying extensive hygiene or social distancing.  In the autumn, influenza will re-emerge (in combination with covid-19) and a possible decrease in natural resilience could lead to even more victims.

Our immune system consists of two parts: an innate, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system. ”

“The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice, intestinal mucus, cilia, commensal flora… and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.”

“If they do attach themselves, macrophages can ensure that the microorganisms are encapsulated and destroyed.”

“The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be elicited in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms. , and the humeral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells).

Recent research indicates that both systems are highly intertwined. ”

“It appears that most people already have innate or general immunity to eg influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined for some passengers who died of Covid-19. most of the passengers were elderly and were on the ship in an ideal situation of transmission. However, 75% turned out not to be infected. So even in this risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus. ”

“A study in the journal ‘Cell’ shows that most people neutralize the corona virus through mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T cells), while experiencing few or no symptoms. The researchers found in a population of uninfected individuals up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4 + T cells, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses “.

“Most people already have a congenital or cross-immunity, because they have already been in contact with variants of the same virus. The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B cells only takes up a relatively small part of our defense. This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there can already be a group immunity.”

“The efficacy of vaccines is evaluated for whether or not they contain these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.”

“Most people who test positive (PCR) have no symptoms. Their immune system is strong enough.”

“Enhancing natural immunity is a much more logical approach.

Prevention is an important, insufficiently exposed pillar: healthy, complete nutrition, exercise in fresh air – without mouth mask, stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts. ”

 

Effects of social isolation on physical and psychological health

“Social isolation and the economic damage has led to an increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse” .

“Studies have shown that the more social and emotional connections people have, the more resistant they are to viruses. It seems that isolation and quarantine are actually deadly.”

“The isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many elderly people and it is compulsory to stay indoors. This while just enough exercise has a positive effect on cognitive functioning, reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety and improving physical health, energy levels, etc. well-being and in general quality of life. ”

“Anxiety, persistent stress, and the social distancing-induced loneliness have been proven to have a negative impact on psychological and general health.”

 

An extremely contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment?

“The mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and approached that of a common seasonal flu (0.2%).” 20

“The number of registered corona deaths still seems overestimated.

There is a difference between death from corona and death from corona. People often carry multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time. Taking into account that most people have developed severe symptoms, suffered from additional pathology, one cannot simply conclude that a corona infection was the cause of death. This was often not taken into account in the statistics. ”

The most vulnerable groups are clearly identifiable. The vast majority of the deceased patients were 80 years or older. The majority (70%) of the deceased, under 70 years, had an underlying condition, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity. ”

“The vast majority of the infected persons (> 98%) did not or hardly became ill or recovered spontaneously.”

“In the meantime, affordable, safe and effective therapy is available for those who do show severe disease symptoms in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and AZT (azithromycin). When applied quickly, this leads to a cure and often prevents hospitalization. Almost nobody needs now. still to die. ”

This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results. to apply this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet, which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was withdrawn. The primary data sources used were found to be unreliable and 2 of the 3 authors were in conflicts of interest. Most guidelines focused on this study however, remained unchanged…

We have serious questions about this state of affairs. ”

“In the US, a group of physicians in the field who see patients every day have united in“ America’s Frontline Doctors ”and gave a press conference that has been viewed millions of times.”

“The French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d’infectiologie de Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising combination therapy in April.”

“The Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with the above combination, is calling on colleagues in a petition for freedom from therapy.

The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: death rates compared with and without this therapy. ”

“From the poignant media images of the ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) where people in agony choked and were ventilated, we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the lung blood vessels. Administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and avoiding artificial respiration, which turned out to lead to additional damage to the lung tissue, means that this dreaded complication also almost no longer leads to death. ”

“So there is no question of a killer virus, but an easily treatable condition.”

Spread

“Spread occurs through droplet infection (only in sick people who cough or sneeze) and aerosols in closed, un-ventilated spaces. Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air.

Contact tracing and epidemiological research have shown that healthy persons (or positively tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Healthy people do not endanger each other.

“Transmission through objects (eg money, groceries or shopping carts) has not been scientifically proven.”

“All this seriously questions the whole policy of social distancing and mandatory face masks for healthy persons – there is no scientific basis for this.”

 

Mouth masks

“Mouth masks belong in contacts with proven risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints and in a medical context / hospital-RVT setting. They reduce the risk of droplet infection through sneezing / coughing. Mouth masks in healthy persons are ineffective against spreading viral infections.”

“Wearing a mouth mask is not without side effects. 32 33 Oxygen deficiency occurs fairly quickly (headache, nausea, fatigue, concentration drops), an effect comparable to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, etc. respiratory problems and hyperventilation caused by wearing face masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism that affects our immunity. Some experts even warn against an increased transmission of the virus if used improperly ”

“Our Labor legislation (Codex 6) speaks of a CO2 content (ventilation in workplaces) of 900ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances. This toxic limit is well exceeded after 1 minute wearing a mask to values ​​three to four times these maximum values. Whoever wears a mask is therefore in an extremely poorly ventilated room! ”

“Inexpert use of mouth masks without extensive medical cardio-pulmonary test record is therefore not recommended by recognized safety specialists for employees.”

“Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where the staff wears masks and there is an accurate regulation of air humidity / temperature with adjusted monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this, and thus meet strict safety standards.”

A second wave of Corona?

“There is now talk of a second wave in Belgium, with the consequent further tightening of the measures. However, a closer examination of the figures of Sciensano, (last report of 3 September 2020)  we find that since mid-July although an increase was observed in the number of infections, there was no increase in hospital admissions and deaths at that time. So it is not a second wave of corona, but a so-called “case chemistry” due to an increased number of tests. ”

“In recent weeks, the number of hospital admissions and deaths has increased (minimally), but when interpreting this we have to take into account the past heat wave. Moreover, the vast majority of the victims are still in the population group> 75 years old.”

“This indicates that the ratio of the measures taken towards the working population and young people is out of proportion with the intended objectives.”

“The vast proportion of positively tested” infected “individuals are in the age group of the active population, who develop none or very limited symptoms because of a well-functioning immune system. ”

“So nothing has changed – the peak is over.”

 

Reinforcement of a prevention policy

“The corona measures are a striking contrast to the minimal policy that the government has pursued to date, when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health benefits such as a sugar tax, ban on (e-) cigarettes and making healthy and healthy people financially attractive and widely accessible. nutrition, exercise and social support networks It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought about a change of mindset in all walks of life with clear public health outcomes Currently only 3% of the health care budget goes to prevention . ”

 

The Hippocratic Oath

As doctors, we took the Hippocratic Oath:

“Above all else, I will take care of my patients, promote their health and alleviate their suffering.”

“I will inform my patients correctly.”

“Even under pressure, I will not use my medical knowledge for practices that are against humanity.”

The current measures force us to act against this oath.

Other health professionals have a similar code.

Also the “primum non nocere” (First, Do no Harm) assumed by every physician and health professional is undermined by the current measures and the prospect of the possible introduction of a generalized vaccine, which has not undergone extensive preliminary testing. ”

 

Vaccine

“Overview studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have only succeeded 3 times in developing a vaccine that achieved an efficiency of over 50%. The vaccination of our elderly appears to be ineffective. Above 75 years of age, the efficiency almost non-existent. ”

“Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also observe every year with the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution that requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented via an emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers already have a Having obtained legal immunity against possible harm raises serious questions.  We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs. ”

“Globally, 700,000 claims or deaths are expected as a result of the vaccine”

“If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually without symptoms, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.”

 

The role of the media and the official communication plan

“In recent months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed almost uncritical to follow the ‘panel of experts’ and the government, where the press should be critical and prevent unilateral government communication. This has led to a public communication in our news media, which was more like propaganda than objective reporting. ”

“In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to present news as objectively and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and critically controlling power, whereby dissenting experts also get a forum to express themselves.”

“This vision is supported by the Journalism Code.”

“The official story that a lock down was necessary, that this was the only possible solution, and that everyone was behind this lock down, made it difficult for dissenters and experts to air a different opinion.” “Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open debates in the media where dissenters could express their views.”

“We have also been amazed at the many videos and articles by many scientific experts and authorities, which were and are being removed from social media. We believe that this is not in keeping with a free, democratic constitutional state, especially as this leads to tunnel vision. this policy is paralyzing and fuels fear and concern in society. In this context, we reject the intention to censure dissenters in the European Union! ”

“The way in which Covid-19 has been portrayed by politicians and media has also done the situation no good. The use in the media of phrases like ‘frontline care heroes’ and ‘victims of Corona’ further fueled fear, as has the idea that we are dealing with a ‘killer virus’ globally. ”

“The relentless bombardment of numbers, unleashed on the population day after day, hour after hour, without indicating those numbers, without comparing them with flu deaths in other years, without comparing them with deaths from other causes. , has induced a true psychosis of fear in the population. This is not information, but manipulation. ”

“We regret the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the information disclosure (ie all dissenting opinions from the official discourse, including by dissenting experts) to be silenced by an unprecedented censorship in the media.”

“We urge the media to still take their responsibility here!”

“We demand an open debate where all experts are heard.”

 

Emergency law versus Human Rights

“The general principle of Good Governance requires weighing up the proportionality of government decisions in the light of Higher Legal Standards: any government interference must be in accordance with fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Government interference is allowed only in crisis circumstances. In other words, discretionary decisions must be proportionate to an absolute necessity. ”

“The measures currently taken concern interference in the exercise of, inter alia, the right to respect for private and family life, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and association, right to education, etc., and must therefore comply with fundamental rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). ”

“For example, interference in the right to private and family life is only allowed in accordance with Article 8, § 2 ECHR if the measures are necessary in the interests of the country’s security, public security, the economic well-being of the country, the protection of public order and the prevention of criminal offenses, the protection of health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the regulatory text on which the interference is based must be clear, foreseeable enough and proportionate to the objectives pursued ” .

“The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions, leading to the establishment of an emergency government. Now that it appears that there is no state of emergency, the condition is that otherwise state of emergency is no longer present. Covid-19 is not a killer virus, but an easily treatable disease with a mortality comparable to a seasonal flu. In other words, there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health. ”

“There is no emergency.”

 

Immense damage from current policy

‘An open discussion about corona measures means that, in addition to the life years gained by corona patients, we also have to consider other factors that influence the health of the total population. Think of damage in the psycho-social domain (increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, domestic violence and child abuse) 16 and the economic damage. ‘

‘If we take this collateral damage into account, the current policy is disproportionate, the proverbial shooting with a cannon at a mosquito.’

“We find it shocking that the government is citing health as the reason for the emergency law. As doctors and health professionals, we can only reject these extremely disproportionate measures for a virus that approaches seasonal flu in terms of harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility. ”

“We are therefore asking for an immediate end to all measures.

We question the legitimacy of today’s advising experts, who meet behind closed doors. ”

“We ask that an independent committee investigate extensively why all freedom-restricting measures are maintained, while the figures and scientific data have now clearly shown that there is no medical reason to maintain this for one more day.”

“Following ACU 2020 46 https://acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/, we request an in-depth investigation into the role of WHO and the possible influence of conflicts of interest in this organization. She was also at the basis of the fight against the “info-chemistry”, ie the systematic censoring of all dissenting opinions in the media. This is unacceptable for a democratic constitutional state. “43

Distribution of this letter

“We want to make a public appeal to our professional associations and fellow healthcare providers to comment on the current measures.

We draw attention to and call for an open discussion, in which care providers are allowed and dare to speak out. ”

“With this open letter, we send out the signal that progress on the same foot does more harm than good, and call on politicians to be independently and critically informed about the available evidence – including that of dissenters, as long as it is based on well-founded science – in the implementation of policy, with the aim of promoting optimal health. ”

 

There you have it.

We at The Dangerous Globe would be the first ones to howl if we felt this was in any way an unjustified complaint, but the truth is, we agree with every word of it. It fits in every way our understanding of the truth of the matter.

Frankly there are several Governments around the Globe that should step down en masse over their handling of this issue but they have too much money to lose from doing so.

More about them later

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Tony Broomfield
Co-Founder of the Dangerous Globe and The Real News. https://dangerousglobe.com https://thereal.news
https://dangerousglobe.com
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
michael abberton
michael abberton
1 month ago

Why not report one of the other two letters, one signed by 700 Belgian doctors (note, not psychiatrists and herbalists) that contradicts this completely. This letter also contains several factual errors in the public domain, the number of deaths in Belgium, public spending on the lockdown and influenza death rate. If you are about reporting the truth, report all of it, and always check your sources. http://www.flanderstoday.eu/700-doctors-plead-public-wear-facemasks